Why "Racism." by Dean Gotcher

by
Dean Gotcher

"Racism," as a structure of thought (and action) or paradigm, is a "top-down," "above-below," "right-wrong" way of thinking and acting, where someone is above or greater than someone else, requiring them to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. By rejecting an external authority, i.e., God, who is greater than man, who declares all mankind as sinners, i.e., equal in nature, needing a savior (external to his nature), all man can do is 'label' all as "racists" who divide him from himself and from others based upon differences they have—based upon some feature(s) they have which others do not have (or some features others have they do not have) the standard by which they establish themselves above or greater than others.

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

It is not a race issue. It is a sin issue.

Those who want to 'justify' sin, i.e., establish their carnal nature, i.e., their love of ("lusting" after) pleasure over and therefore against God's authority, i.e., the father's/Father's authority system, 'label' all as "racist" who do not affirm them, i.e., affirm their carnal nature, i.e., their love of ("lusting" after) pleasure, what all men have in common—the basis of common-ism. By declaring the father's/Father's authority, i.e., his/His "top-down," "above-below," "right-wrong" way of thinking as "racist," those of the world are able to (in their mind) 'liberate' their "self" from having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth that go against their carnal nature, so they can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders), so they can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity (affirmation), making their sinful nature the basis of equality.

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

Racism (hate, rejection, or subjugation of others because of their skin color) is wrong. God sees us all as "equal." We are all "equal" before God in our sinful nature, only through Christ Jesus being redeemed, i.e., saved from judgment, condemnation, and damnation, i.e., saved from the consequence of our sins, i.e., of our love of ("lusting" after) pleasure over and therefore against God's authority. Following man's 'logic' (definition) of "racism," our 'justifying' our "self," i.e., 'justifying' our carnal nature, i.e., our love of ("lusting" after) pleasure and hate of restraint before one another is "racist" in itself—establishing our "self," i.e., our sinful nature, i.e., our love of pleasure and hate of restraint over and therefore against God's authority, requiring Him (in our carnal mind, through dialogue with our "self") to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline His self in order to do our will.

The only reason you are depressed is God is not doing it your way.

"Not feeling at home in the sinful world [in a world where he is told he is a sinner], Critical Criticism [the child, in private questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority, by nature being antithetical to authority] must set up a sinful world in its own home [where the child, dialoguing with his "self," 'justifies' his "self," i.e., 'justifies' his carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment,' 'justifies' his resentment toward restraint, hating the father's/Father's authority when it gets in his way, i.e., when it will not, i.e., refuses to dialogue with him, 'justifying' (affirming) him (his carnal nature)]." "Critical Criticism [the child, "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, hating restraint, dialoguing with his "self," 'justifying' his "self" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority] is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family) Since the child 'liberates' his "self" from the father's/Father's authority in his dialogue with his "self," dialogue (dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., 'reasoning' from/through "feelings") is the only pathway to 'liberating' the child's carnal nature, i.e., "human nature" from the father's/Father's authority in society. Whoever resists dialogue, i.e., the child's carnal nature must therefore be silenced, i.e., negated., since they are already silenced, i.e., negated in the child's "Critical Criticism," i.e., in his praxis of 'justifying' his "self," i.e., 'justifying' his carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, in his dialogue with his "self."

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') In other words, Karl Marx is saying: "Lust" "reconciles us to" "the world." For Marx, if pleasure ("lust") is the 'drive' and the 'purpose' of life, then negating the father's/Father's authority, which gets in the way of pleasure, must take place, i.e., be put into praxis, i.e., social action (affirmative action).

By rejecting discussion—which retains the father's/Father's "top-down," "above-below," "right-wrong" authority system—those who, declaring all who adhere to the father's/Father's "top-down," "above-below," "right-wrong" way of thinking and acting (paradigm) as "racist," can only recognize dialogue, which negates the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "racism" (in their mind). There is not father's/Father's "top-down," "above-below," "right-wrong (prejudiced) authority in dialogue. This is why when you attempt to discuss right and wrong with others (making both you and them subject to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., subject to the father's/Father's authority) they 'shift' the communication to dialogue, doing so in order (as in "new" world order) to 'justify' their carnal nature over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority so they can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity, i.e., with your affirmation. If you abdicate discussion, i.e., doing right and wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your and their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, sustaining the father's/Father's authority system and join them in dialogue instead, 'justifying' your and their carnal nature, i.e., your and their love of ("lusting" after) pleasure and hate of restraint, i.e., "human nature," you are no longer a "racist" (in their mind). If you do not join them in dialogue, 'justifying' your and their carnal nature, i.e., your and their love of ("lusting" after) pleasure and hate of restraint you are a "racist." In their 'logic' if you make them "feel" guilty for their sins you are "racist," i.e., prejudiced against them and their carnal nature.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12